Is Technology Failing to Simplify Life? Tim Ferriss on Economist.com 60 Comments

Written by Tim Ferriss Topics: Low-Information Diet


Do you think technology simplifies or complicates life?

I was recently invited to participate in a debate sponsored by The Economist, and it just went live.

The proposition: If the promise of technology is to simplify our lives, it is failing.

Do you agree or disagree?

There are some fascinating points made by both debaters, and I add a few observations of my own. Be sure to read their “opening statements,” which are what I focus on, before their later rebuttals. Here is the first part of my commentary as a “featured participant”:

I receive 500–1,000 e-mail per day.

To contend with this, I have virtual assistants in Canada and sub-assistants in Bangalore who filter my inboxes using processing rules in Google Docs. Connected via Skype and compensated via PayPal, this team translates a 10-hour task into a 20-minute phone call…

[Read the rest of this one-pager here]

It will be obvious why I voted “pro”.

In order to vote — and I find this ironic — you need to first “register” in the top right of the screen, then get a screen name, then click on “pro” or “con”. Simple. :)

Popularity: 5% [?]

Posted on March 4th, 2008

Comment Rules: Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That's how we're gonna be -- cool. Critical is fine, but if you're rude, we'll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! (Thanks to Brian Oberkirch for the inspiration)

60 Responses to “Is Technology Failing to Simplify Life? Tim Ferriss on Economist.com”

  • Jose Castro-Frenzel
    March 4th, 2008
    5:44 pm

    That is real ironic, I guess things get more and more complicated with any sort of interaction. Furthermore, Tim what do you think causes a blog site to be successful, other than huge injections of money from VCs?

    Just curious, b/c I have noticed how quickly your blog site has generated so much traffic.

    Cheers

    Jose Castro-Frenzel

  • Jeremy
    March 4th, 2008
    5:56 pm

    I think it is ridiculous to say that technology doesn’t simplify.

    Washing machines make cleaning dishes faster. Mobile phones allow me to travel around outside my house when I am waiting for a call, and without technology I wouldn’t have a call anyway, I would be walking. I am able to write and communicate within minutes with a lot of people because of this computer; otherwise we would have to walk to a wall somewhere and write what we thought, there’s nothing simple about that and we would have to worry about food and other things at that point—it would take all day.

    I do think technology can cause problems with some people, but that is the person not making good use of the technology. Spending 6 hours of your day on your iPhone isn’t a problem of the technology.

  • longwalksinparis.blogspot.com
    March 4th, 2008
    5:57 pm

    In my day-to-day personal life technology does indeed simplify the world – because I control IT. However in business and the everyday work world technology has a trajectory of faster work and more work for the human participants.

  • Ivan
    March 4th, 2008
    6:25 pm

    Technology isn’t the one that fails. People who don’t know how to use it appropriately and moderately are the ones who fail.

  • David Cone
    March 4th, 2008
    6:38 pm

    As a computer science student I believe a lot of this is not only the technology but how people interact with it. With a large lack of natural computer skills it can be more complicating for a lot of people. Growing up with lots of technology and living in a technology world for the past two years has given me the ability to use it so naturally that I use it as someone may use their shoes. I think this is true with a lot of younger people, for those who have children younger then 15 or 16 you might see what I’m talking about in how they use technology as an extension not a tool. However despite all of this I don’t think it is fair to fault a person for not having natural computer skills right now, although that may not be true in 40 or 50 years, and so I must fault technology. For now.

    -David Cone

  • Roman Hardgrave
    March 4th, 2008
    6:39 pm

    Tim,
    I guess its fated that I come see you speak at SXSW. My planned flight got sold out, so I had to book an earlier one…later that day I saw your speaking schedule and realized I can now attend your Friday gig.

    Looking forward to hearing you in person, I’ve enjoyed your writing.

    Roman

  • blogrdoc
    March 4th, 2008
    6:48 pm

    I say it does. Unequivocally, so, I think. It extends life span. It lets us communicate easily. These are core ‘quality of life’ factors for which there is a clear improvement. Memory tends to be selective and reminisce to the ‘good old days’.

    Props for getting into the Economist. :)

  • Morgan
    March 4th, 2008
    7:03 pm

    Thanks for this article and debate Tim. I work as a pc tech, so i just help people with their computer, and it’s crazy how complicated everything is.

    Peope don’t want complex things, and when i see a new client, i ask them to write down, simple essential tasks they want to do with their computer, like ” write mail”, “play music”, and i focus on making it simple.
    The poeple like apple who make it simple are the big winners.

  • Kerwin
    March 4th, 2008
    7:24 pm

    I disagree, it is not failing at all (by the way, the question is weird because of how it is worded/asked); I was in Cairns, Australia where it was 1:00a and I was communicating with my colleagues back here in the U.S. at the start of their work day. It was a beautiful thing. It was as if I was at my desk…

  • Marvin
    March 4th, 2008
    8:24 pm

    In the current form, technology – more specifically, technology that’s used to connect people and organizations (as opposed to, say, traction control in one’s car) – is clearly causing more problems than it solves, especially when it comes to the electronic leashes that organizations use on their people.

    But I think there’s more to the debate than just whether this technology is making life easier or more difficult.

    These technologies seem to be intended to drive productivity and further fatten profit margins. In and of itself, that’s not necessarily a bad thing. I’m as much a capitalist as the next guy.

    But from where I sit, I see that this drive to enhance profit margins has become an end unto itself, rather than a means to an end. Sure, organizations and the people that work for them may enjoy more abundant resources, specifically money, but what good is that when one is distanced from family, when one can’t enjoy the fruits of one’s labours, when one doesn’t have time to appreciate the higher standard of living that one is working so hard for and dies of a stress-induced coronary at the ripe old age of 52?

    Money and profits are simply a means to a better quality of life. In my opinion, when the pursuit of money becomes an end unto itself, THAT’S where the problem lies. These issues of technology and the 24/7 lifestyle are just a symptom of that illness.

  • Jan Caballero
    March 4th, 2008
    10:15 pm

    Hi Tim. I am honestly half and half on the issue but if I had to pick, I guess I would say that technology simplying lives is NOT failing. You are a popular person and it obviously works for you. For someone like me who is just getting there, it definitely has been helpful but sometimes a hindrance.

    (ie. doing too much research on the internet for hours because i’m too anal when really my team of assistants in india can do it for me!)

    -Jan

  • blog
    March 4th, 2008
    11:04 pm

    At the risk of sounding cheeky, I think anyone who votes “con” is over-complicating the question.

  • Norman Dacanay
    March 4th, 2008
    11:18 pm

    Perspective, perspective, perspective…

    As blogrdoc mentioned, technology as a whole has increased core qualities of life, however there are too many examples of technology complicating life to make this a one-sided debate.

    Right now I work in a bank, usually it would be another boring day processing transactions and what not, but today the entire system for our bank (on a national level) went bonkers. I am talking about just over 6 hours of the day without proper working computer systems, ATMs, online and telephone banking. It nearly brought the whole branch to its knees and nearly drove me to a homicidal rage (lucky for everyone my shoulder was sore). So here’s my piece…If technology is supposed to simplify our lives then why does our everyday life hinge on the continuous and correct running of our technological crutches.

    Internet, banks, power grids (everyone remember the huge east coast black out a couple years back?)…We might be the ones pushing the buttons and turning the dials, but right now we are at technologies electronic mercy.

    Improving the quality of life…technology has done an undeniably great job of that.

    Increasing simplicity in one’s life…technology is seemingly light years away.

  • Evan Briones
    March 4th, 2008
    11:54 pm

    I believe it’s because technology lacking open standards has a negative effect on the consumers. It becomes impossible for separate technologies to integrate because of “proprietary bull shit. Truthfully technology would benefit on focusing on simplification instead of excess features. More features does not necessary mean a better product. Have to leave it to technologists of the future to solve the current flaws.

  • Cameron
    March 5th, 2008
    1:24 am

    2 words. cell phone. The entire concept of a cell phone is it makes me accessible to other people at any time, I am always at their beck and call (if the phone is on). This doesn’t simplify my life at all, rather, it adds more and more tasks to my already chaotic life.

    I really wish I could just pull a Tim (and go live somewhere for a while), but being a college student, with mandatory attendance in classes, it’s not exactly possible. A Muse would make my life easier using technology, but in my current situation, technology just makes me increasingly available to professors every beck and call…

  • Peter Balogh
    March 5th, 2008
    2:29 am

    I think a more appropriate question is to ask, “Is the responsible use of technology failing to simplify life?”

    Technology, like many things, can be abused (just ask anyone with a Blackberry. Better yet, email them and time how long the reply takes).

    If technology is supposed to simplify our lives, it takes just as much effort from us to keep it from taking that life over. It’s not just “set it and forget it”.

  • Nick Pagan
    March 5th, 2008
    2:36 am

    If the promise of technology is to simplify our lives, it is failing. Agree or disagree.

    If I agree that technology simplifies my life then I have to vote disagree to the statement that it is failing to do this.

    What a terribly worded proposition. I wouldn’t put any trust in the results generated as the proposition is so easy to misinterpret.

    I would have posted this complaint on the Economist website (which I normally hold in high-esteem) but I couldn’t be bothered to go through the lengthy process of registering.

    What does this say? IMO technology simplifies life – it’s human beings who insist on making things overly complicated in their communications and in their processes. Shame on the Economist!

  • Reseforum
    March 5th, 2008
    2:51 am

    Ah that’s why I couldn’t vote. They should at least have a message telling you that when you try to click the button. Anyway, I also vote pro by somewhat the same reasons as you =).

  • Glen
    March 5th, 2008
    7:32 am

    I think the debate around this question although being valid, requires more of a definition.
    If by simplifies it means easier then yes it does make many jobs easier.
    But yet completing these tasks in a shorter amount of time then requires you to fill up your day otherwise. Most time this means completing more of these tasks thus making my life more complicated.
    A person 15 years ago may of had a smaller workload but still have done the same hours as someone today.
    It basically comes down to the fact if you wish to vote numerically or mentally

  • Mike W.
    March 5th, 2008
    9:31 am

    Technology is a tool. Whether it simplifies your life or not, depends on how you use it. The Internet, email, cell phones, and other technology has made many things possible for the “ordinary man” that would not have been possible before. If nothing else, anyone can have virtually free access to talk with the world.

  • BillyWarhol
    March 5th, 2008
    9:36 am

    LOLLLLLL Glad to hear yer OutSourcing Drudge Work to 3rd World Countries like Canada India* ;)) Keep it coming we need the Jobs!

    I remember coming across the ACT s/w program over 20 Years ago it was a godsend to Manage all your Calls Meetings ToDo’s* As some have pointed out here it is the People that have to use the Technology properly but no doubt it can be a Huge Help*

    ;)) Peace*

  • Andrew Blakeslee
    March 5th, 2008
    9:45 am

    I think the question is misleading – I think while technology probably adds some complexity, properly used it can drastically increase the QUALITY of one’s life. In my case, it not only increases the quality of my life, but medical technology has given me life. I am 43 years old and was kept alive by a pacemaker/icd for ten years and received a heart transplant in October of last year. Had I been born 25 years earlier, I would have been dead at 33, not worrying too much about simplicity vs. complexity. Technology, particularly in the form of high-speed internet access and opensource software is also enabling me to try and build a business (and design a lifestyle) in spite of medical challenges. I have the resources from home (even lying in bed if necessary) to publish a book (The Trouble with Trizms), maintain a website, launch marketing campaigns, etc., etc. – while none of this qualifies as simple, it allows complex tasks that used to require large staffs and lots of capital resources to be done by one-person operations.

    Andy

  • Zaid Rasid
    March 5th, 2008
    9:57 am

    I disagree for a really simple reason. When I was in highschool I had a huge cd collection of music. One I was very proud of. I also had a Sony Discman that I would carry around everywhere along with a cd case that held about 5-6 of my favourite cds. As technology evolved the Ipod came out. Now my entire cd collection fits in my right pocket of my jeans. Now I have all my music with me all the time. That to me is simply amazing. Go technology:)

  • Art Gonzalez
    March 5th, 2008
    10:50 am

    I agree with several of the other commentators that technology per se does simplify our lives. Is peoples decision on how to apply it and how much to use that complicates things. One should declutter as much, while remaining as effective as possible. There are plenty of technology options to achieve this.

    As for outsourcing of work, I would also like to recommend my native Costa Rica. For about $450 per month you can have a full time virtual assistant. There is a good bilingual base, excellent level of education and Central time zone. Also to consider this destination for your adventure travels.

  • Michael Arroyo
    March 5th, 2008
    11:22 am

    Where can I find the best outsourced MBAs for research and projects?

  • Clay | Productivity Guru SMACKDOWN: Tim Ferriss v. Dave Allen
    March 5th, 2008
    11:23 am

    Yes, technology is failing to simplify, but once I get just one more application for my PDA, or another 15 firefox extensions, my life WILL be simple.

    -Clay

  • Michael Arroyo
    March 5th, 2008
    11:37 am

    The exponential growth of technology and the displacement of families in the US is the revenge of the original Native Americans spirits in my opinion.

    Technology need discipline simple as that. On that note where can I outsource a lot of MBA work? and can they manage the MBA projects as well.

    Adios Amigo.

  • TonyB
    March 5th, 2008
    11:56 am

    It’s just like everything else. One hand gives and the other takes away.

  • Becky
    March 5th, 2008
    1:11 pm

    Does technology simplify life? No, I don’t think so – but we have to be very careful with the definition of “simplify” and not confuse it with “improve.”

    Take the example of washing dishes.

    Is it simpler to wash dishes by hand, or put them in the dishwasher? It is SIMPLER to wash dishes by hand, because there are fewer steps and fewer time-segments to juggle – rinse/load/wait for a full load/run/wait for dry/put away, as opposed to wash/let dry/put away. But if I have a huge stack after a big dinner or something, It’s EASIER and FASTER (not necessarily SIMPLER) to put them in the dishwasher.

    Add to this that having and using a dishwasher means I have to choose every day whether to wash by hand or use the dishwasher, and which dishes should always be washed by hand (not many, in my house!), and have two kinds of detergent (one for hand-washing and one for dishwasher), and earn the cost of owning and maintaining the appliance itself.

    For this example, and I think most others, technology gives us more options, CAN give us more time if used wisely, but does NOT make life simpler.

  • Bryan
    March 5th, 2008
    3:47 pm

    The following article about “Maslow’s hierarchy of Needs” adds some debth into why we love/hate technology.

    http://www.smallerindiana.com/profiles/blog/show?id=1736855:BlogPost:35984

  • etavitom
    March 5th, 2008
    5:11 pm

    I agree. Thanks for another wise post. I am always referring to your post and it’s truly profound! Most appreciated, Brad

  • Stephen
    March 5th, 2008
    5:33 pm

    The most over-complicated part seems to be the question itself.

    “Vote Pro / Vote Con”? So hold on, am I voting that I’m pro technology, or pro the statement that technology is failing to simplify my life?

    A simple change of terminology to “Vote Yes / Vote No” would clear up any ambiguity, and points to the fact that it’s usually the people behind the technology that cause unnecessary confusion and complication.

    ###

    I totally agree that the wording is REALLY confusing. It’s like putting a bunch of double-negatives in anything. “Do you not agree that the US shouldn’t stop people from quitting smoking?” Huh? Better wording needed, for sure.

    Tim

  • Daniele
    March 5th, 2008
    5:56 pm

    Tim,

    I vote Yes every day of the week. Like you said in the interview with Scoble though, the eccessive use can become paralitic – I guess that is where most people are struggling to draw the line.

  • Tim Ferriss
    March 5th, 2008
    6:33 pm

    Hi All,

    I totally agree that the wording is REALLY confusing on the proposition.

    It’s like putting a bunch of double-negatives in anything. “Do you not agree that the US shouldn’t stop people from quitting smoking?” Huh? Better wording needed, for sure.

    Tim

  • Najeeb
    March 5th, 2008
    8:15 pm

    Tim,

    RE: IPHOTO ON GMAIL

    You posted not being able to attach IPhotos when sending a Gmail. Here’s what you do:
    Click attach a file
    Then choose file
    Then Pictures on the left side of your finder
    Then choose iPhoto Library
    Then choose the year
    Then choose the month
    Then choose the date of the photo.

    “Wah lah” as we rednecks say (voila)

    If I can help you, please feel free to contact me.

    Najeeb
    (I purchased one of your 4HWW manuscripts)

    ###

    Hi Najeeb,

    If I click on “Pictures” then “iPhoto Library”, it just shows the info on the library but doesn’t go any deeper or allow me to select anything. I’m using Tiger. No worries — I’ll figure it out. Just a pain in the ass to export, and I do know I can use mail as my client, but it seems like a very counter-intuitive pain-in-the-ass un-Mac way of doing it.

    People go to silly lengths to defend Macs, but let’s be honest. Lots of functions are just easier on a PC. Not that I’m going back, as I couldn’t deal with Vista crashing and constant updates, but let’s be honest… :)

    Tim

  • Lyndon
    March 6th, 2008
    12:08 am

    Well — with slightly less advanced medical technology my life would be simplified because I’d be dead of cancer.
    So some complication is well worth the alternatives.

    Poorly designed technology fails, but reading, oh for instance James Thurber shows how much one can complicate things at handwritten and snail mail speeds…

  • Andy
    March 6th, 2008
    8:39 am

    Tim,

    Would you agree that technology at least gives people the *ability* to simplify their lives?

    I was just thinking that it would be awfully hard to start and run BrainQuicken or any ‘muse’ (and therefore automate income) without technology. That automation plays a big role in simplifying people’s lives.

    Andy

  • akthe47
    March 6th, 2008
    9:30 am

    Andy: Not to sound like a jerk, but your post (and several others) goes to show you haven’t completely read Tim’s post on the economist.

    There’s no interest in whether technology simplifies life at the very least (i.e., greater than zero simplification than without it), whether technology simplifies life completely (i.e., 100% simplification than without it), or technology even gives the ability to simplify (because clearly it does).

    Tim’s discussion (and rightfully so) focuses on what he calls the end sum of what technology does to simplify life.

    Your argument is the equivalent of someone stating something like, ‘German car engineers are more intelligent than American car engineers,’ then you retorting that there is 1 example of an American car engineer who has a higher IQ than a German counterpart.

    Everyone: Please do Tim the least duty of reading his position on Economist before replying! I think we owe him at least that much.

  • ak
    March 6th, 2008
    9:37 am

    Andy and everyone else: Tim’s position on Economist clearly states he’s interested in the end sum of technology simplifying life, not whether technology does it all or does it completely.

    Please read Tim’s position before replying!

  • Erik Cox
    March 6th, 2008
    11:06 am

    The part I find amusing is your observation for the Economist’s voting mechanism! I am sure they want to capture all the contact information for good (marketing) reasons, but c’mon guys… register with your site just to vote on something? Just be happy with the cookie on my computer!

    The complication with that scenario is – I want to contribute to the discussion, but not at the “risk” of giving out my info, because they will add me to their email list and clog my inbox with stuff I don’t care about. I read that page because someone I admire was featured on it, nothing more. Next week or next month they will put out more stuff having nothing of interest to me, and I will try and remember why I am getting the email from them.

    Way too much to think about just to vote yay or nay :)

  • dnc
    March 6th, 2008
    12:18 pm

    Cmon now Tim, how could technology be failing to simply life. It must be used appropriately. Yes, you say information fast, unplug, you get too many emails and we are burdened by the tether of blackberrys etc etc. However, without technology you wouldnt have a network that consists of Canadians and Indians. Technology is a burden until used correctly, then it simplifies. (hello non-american who filters these before Tim, keep up the good work;)

  • Jose Castro-Frenzel
    March 6th, 2008
    3:54 pm

    Leopard X Tim!!! You are still running Tiger? Time to switch over, I have an extra copy so let me know if you want it. Furthermore, you should get iLife08 makes iphoto so much easier to use. Let me know if you want these, I bought extra copies that I got stuck with. Anyhow, looking forward to more posts.

    Jose Castro-Frenzel

  • blogrdoc
    March 6th, 2008
    8:25 pm

    Thanks, Tim, for your frankness about Macs. As a long time PC user, I’ve wondered about if Macs are necessarily easier. Ultimately, I think it’s up to the user to work out the kinks, regardless of what platform.

    I must say, however, that the Mac Air is looking very attractive. At $1800, I think that’s actually not a bad deal considering how light and thin it is, with 4-5h battery life.

  • Andy
    March 6th, 2008
    11:23 pm

    I read the entire post. I hold that my question still stands and is even strengthened by the part that you highlight. For Tim, and many others who use technology appropriately, the end sum is a simplification of their life. Who cares if you get 1,000 emails a day – if you are smart enough to leverage technology, your life is still made more simple.

    When we refer to the “net sum” I believe we are referring to the net sum of simplification on one person’s life, not the net sum on everyone’s life, regardless of their ability or discipline to properly use technology. I got this impression from the question: Do you feel more overwhelmed than you did last year or five years ago?

    I don’t follow how any of the concepts are equivalent to the American/German car engineer question – please elaborate.

  • Marvin
    March 7th, 2008
    7:14 am

    Interesting side-note to this discussion is an article on the BBC website today entitled, “E-mail is ruining my life!”

    The crux of the article is this: Email can be a boon to communication, but the price to be paid is something like 52 hours per year wading through junk.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7281707.stm

  • akthe47
    March 7th, 2008
    10:15 am

    Andy: I don’t think you’re grasping Tim’s concept of
    end sum.

    When you ask, ‘Does it at least give the ability…’ you’re asking the equivalent of, ‘Does technology simplify anything at all’ (a ‘greater than zero percent’ concept). That type of argument doesn’t hold much water in debate because rarely are ideals so extreme as to be 100% or 0% in one direction; thus, a statement of greater than 0% or less than 100% doesn’t provide much value at all since so few ideals are that extreme in the first place.

    Tim isn’t proposing that technology does not simplify life AT ALL, but rather that after all is taken into consideration, it doesn’t simplify as much as we’d like to think.

  • Mike
    March 7th, 2008
    6:50 pm

    Tim,

    Are your Canadian-based assistants being phased *in* or *out*? I had thought you only outsourced this work to India.

    I’m looking to hire a remote personal assistant, so your insight would be appreciated. Wages would obviously be lower in India than Canada, but perhaps English language skills need play a role in decisions on selected locale.

    Thank you –

    Mike

    ###

    Hi Mike,

    I outsource to the talent that gives me the best value per dollar spent. In some cases, I’ve found that to be Canada for language-intensive tasks, but my people run the gamut.

    Hope that helps!

    Tim

  • Stef
    March 7th, 2008
    9:40 pm

    Michael,

    You are so right! The problem is not the technology itself but the lack of discipline with which most people approach technology.

    I for myself wouldn’t want to live without running water, central heaters or ebook readers (except when I go bushwalking that is, and even then I have a solarpanel for my ebooks… :-)

    Cheers,
    S

  • Searching… « Angelswords Weblog
    March 9th, 2008
    12:39 am

    [...] Tim Ferriss participated in a debate on Economist.com and the question was simply, “If technology promises to simply our lives, is it failing?”  Those of us in the Google era would have to say that search has truly simplified our lives.  What are your thoughts on other current technologies?     [...]

  • Carrie
    March 9th, 2008
    1:04 pm

    Tim,

    I wonder, could you do a post on how 4hww affects your love life?
    ie is being efficient in other areas- ie cooking, reflective on how you would be in
    the boudoir? Or in romance?

    Carriex

  • phraedus
    March 10th, 2008
    3:08 am

    The link to the economist is broken to your part of the debate. Just the outcome. Can you fix it, or post it here.

  • Nick D
    March 10th, 2008
    4:14 am

    Hi

    Technology exists & its awesomely impressive.

    We can either let it “use us” or we can *use it* to give us the lifestyle we want. We can’t just sit back and let it come to us & expect it to do all the work for us…

  • Knowledge Management for Law Firms :: In case you missed it… Mar 2 - 8, 2008 « LawyerKM :: Knowledge Management & Technology for Lawyers and Law Firms
    March 10th, 2008
    8:46 am

    [...] Is Technology Failing to Simplify Life? (Tim Ferriss) [...]

  • Nate
    March 10th, 2008
    12:26 pm

    In the end, It’s not that technology has simplified or brought complexity to our lives. Our lives are still a result of the day to day choices that we make. For example, we could decide to create online automated businesses and free ourselves from payment paperwork etc. due to the advent of online credit card processing. On the other hand, if we owned a restaurant, we could use that same technology to process more orders and serve more customers in the same time, making us busier cooking, ordering supplies, etc..

    So really we have simply given more choices, which is why life-style design is so important! So keep leading us to the best of it! Thanks Tim

  • Gary Lapointe
    March 21st, 2008
    7:57 pm

    Whoever said technology would simplify my life?

    I use tech to complicate my life and make it better. Not simpler.

    If I just used a few tech tools, it could simplify my life. An answering machine simplified it. And a fax machine. But those are very 1/2 duplex technologies.

    Much of what unsimplifies life are the more interactive tech. And e-mail, but I consider e-mail more than 1/2 duplex, maybe 3/4 duplex because you can get an interactive rhythm sometimes….

  • Caleb Berry
    March 25th, 2008
    11:41 pm

    Love the the 4hww!!! In my quest to become a member of the NR I’ve had successes and setbacks… One thing I would love to know is how does someone in sales truly implement these principles and become mobile?
    Am I looking at a career change or does anyone have good advice?
    Thanks.

  • Sean
    April 29th, 2008
    10:59 am

    Who said technology is simplifying lives? Why is that even a desirable feature? If we wanted to simplify our lives, we could go back to the Hunter-Gatherer culture (well, not really anymore..) .. What’s great about technology is how it empowers us! Group communication and organization and freedom of information afford us all greater potential and realization of that potential. And the means by which we can organize our society by our own terms, not the terms of the broadcast establishments.

  • The dumbing down of America « Emerson Direct Marketing Observations
    May 12th, 2008
    2:24 pm

    [...] If it can, and it’s fast and solves a problem, and speeds up a process, it’s a winner. Tim Ferris comes right out and states that he receives 500 to 1000 emails a [...]

  • Alan
    July 9th, 2008
    1:12 am

    Hi Tim,

    Just wanted to bring this editorial from the Wall Street Journal to your attention, I’m sure you’ll find it interesting…

    http://online.wsj.com/article/information_age.html

  • Dharmesh Acharya
    November 29th, 2008
    2:31 am

    Today technology has simplified life for human, in India every one carrying mobile today including sweeper & drivers and allow people to stay connected in difficult situation like recent Mumbai Attack by Pakistani Terrorist.

    Staff of Taj hotel sent out SMS to all who were outside and lot of people rescued thanks to technology.

    On business we developed website for a client and have 50,000 members where she doesn’t need staff to manage it. System is designed that with her 3-4 hours of efforts she can maintain it online.

    Today technology has simplified life for human, in India every one carrying mobile today including sweeper & drivers and allow people to stay connected in difficult situation like recent Mumbai Attack by Pakistani Terrorist.

    Staff of Taj hotel sent out SMS to all who were outside and lot of people rescued thanks to technology.

    On business we developed website for a client and have 50,000 members where she doesn’t need staff to manage it. System is designed that with her 3-4 hours of efforts she can maintain it online.

Subscribe to followup comments via RSS | TrackBack URL

Leave a Comment or a Question

Comment Rules: Remember what Fonzie was like? Cool. That's how we're gonna be -- cool. Critical is fine, but if you're rude, we'll delete your stuff. Please do not put your URL in the comment text and please use your PERSONAL name or initials and not your business name, as the latter comes off like spam. Have fun and thanks for adding to the conversation! (Thanks to Brian Oberkirch for the inspiration)




If you’d like a picture to show up by your name, get a Gravatar.