<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Top 5 Reasons to Be a Jack of All Trades</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/</link>
	<description>Tim Ferriss's 4-Hour Workweek and Lifestyle Design Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/comment-page-1/#comment-63412</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/#comment-63412</guid>
		<description>Mr. Ferris-

Infinite thanks for such a well-written, fresh perspective. I have been a jack-of-all-trades my entire life and have followed numerous pursuits- softball, vocal jazz, choir, cross country, guitar, painting, writing, photography, piano..(you name it), and have received opposition, discouragement, and disapproval from the majority of the people that I know. How many reading this can relate to being called everything from a &quot;quitter&quot; to &quot;indecisive&quot;? Well, you&#039;re correct, Mr. Ferris, we are NEITHER.

In fact we are the most qualified sort of people because we bring rich variety to everything that we do. I&#039;ve always known that being a JOAT was the right thing for me, so I followed my heart and have reaped extroardinary benefits. I am considered by myself and others an excellent softball player, vocalist, and writer. Additionally I am a very good runner, guitarist, and volleyball player. I relay this to verify that IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPECIALIZE (I.E EXCEL) AT ONE OR MORE THINGS WHILE STILL BEING A JACK OF ALL TRADES. Ferris is correct in stating that the term &quot;jack-of-all-trades, master of none&quot; is indeed artificial pairing when looking realistically at the 80% 20% rule; it is my guess that fellow JOATs work very hard at a multitude of subjects, thus outperforming the lazy specialist. 

One thing that&#039;s great about JOATs is that we&#039;re fearless- and simply don&#039;t conform. I&#039;d personally prefer to have personal satisfaction with what I do (whatever it is) than become someone else&#039;s robotic-performing-monkey just so that I&#039;m deemed &quot;sufficient&quot;. Haha. 

A million thanks to you, can&#039;t wait to read your book! 

Sincerely,
Hannah</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Ferris-</p>
<p>Infinite thanks for such a well-written, fresh perspective. I have been a jack-of-all-trades my entire life and have followed numerous pursuits- softball, vocal jazz, choir, cross country, guitar, painting, writing, photography, piano..(you name it), and have received opposition, discouragement, and disapproval from the majority of the people that I know. How many reading this can relate to being called everything from a &#8220;quitter&#8221; to &#8220;indecisive&#8221;? Well, you&#8217;re correct, Mr. Ferris, we are NEITHER.</p>
<p>In fact we are the most qualified sort of people because we bring rich variety to everything that we do. I&#8217;ve always known that being a JOAT was the right thing for me, so I followed my heart and have reaped extroardinary benefits. I am considered by myself and others an excellent softball player, vocalist, and writer. Additionally I am a very good runner, guitarist, and volleyball player. I relay this to verify that IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPECIALIZE (I.E EXCEL) AT ONE OR MORE THINGS WHILE STILL BEING A JACK OF ALL TRADES. Ferris is correct in stating that the term &#8220;jack-of-all-trades, master of none&#8221; is indeed artificial pairing when looking realistically at the 80% 20% rule; it is my guess that fellow JOATs work very hard at a multitude of subjects, thus outperforming the lazy specialist. </p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s great about JOATs is that we&#8217;re fearless- and simply don&#8217;t conform. I&#8217;d personally prefer to have personal satisfaction with what I do (whatever it is) than become someone else&#8217;s robotic-performing-monkey just so that I&#8217;m deemed &#8220;sufficient&#8221;. Haha. </p>
<p>A million thanks to you, can&#8217;t wait to read your book! </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Hannah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creating The New World, Part 4 Abundance &#124; Real Life Spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/comment-page-1/#comment-63323</link>
		<dc:creator>Creating The New World, Part 4 Abundance &#124; Real Life Spirituality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 03:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/#comment-63323</guid>
		<description>[...] you can jump beyond the naturally related fields. Tim Ferriss pointed out the benefits of this approach. (HT: Hunter Nuttall) “The jack of all trades maximizes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you can jump beyond the naturally related fields. Tim Ferriss pointed out the benefits of this approach. (HT: Hunter Nuttall) “The jack of all trades maximizes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JFGrissom</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/comment-page-1/#comment-63311</link>
		<dc:creator>JFGrissom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/#comment-63311</guid>
		<description>According to Michael Gerber (E-Myth), one should be a Jack of at least 3 trades. (But the 3 really encompass many sub-skillsets, including being a &quot;people-person&quot;).

Entrepreneur, Manager, and Technician.

I&#039;ll buy that a JOAT will do better in this economy... specialization only works in really large companies that have created, (and can afford) positions with idle time.

From my own experience:
One could never be an &quot;enterprise level systems integrator&quot; without being a JOAT. 
One could never be an &quot;enterprise level solutions architect&quot; without being JOAT.

I&#039;ve seen specialist fail at this for years, because they can&#039;t see the entire picture... they only see what they specialized in.
The ones who only specialize do the work but leave a &quot;mess&quot; behind them when they leave.

Having a lot of width and depth on key items is what I have be successful. Leadership/&quot;People-Skill&quot; is definitely one to go deep on but certainly not the only skill needed, IMHO.

I believe the same is true for any Entrepreneur. 
They have to see the entire picture, and be a good leader to boot... it is no wonder leaders are so few compared to the masses... it is pretty demanding stuff!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Michael Gerber (E-Myth), one should be a Jack of at least 3 trades. (But the 3 really encompass many sub-skillsets, including being a &#8220;people-person&#8221;).</p>
<p>Entrepreneur, Manager, and Technician.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll buy that a JOAT will do better in this economy&#8230; specialization only works in really large companies that have created, (and can afford) positions with idle time.</p>
<p>From my own experience:<br />
One could never be an &#8220;enterprise level systems integrator&#8221; without being a JOAT.<br />
One could never be an &#8220;enterprise level solutions architect&#8221; without being JOAT.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen specialist fail at this for years, because they can&#8217;t see the entire picture&#8230; they only see what they specialized in.<br />
The ones who only specialize do the work but leave a &#8220;mess&#8221; behind them when they leave.</p>
<p>Having a lot of width and depth on key items is what I have be successful. Leadership/&#8221;People-Skill&#8221; is definitely one to go deep on but certainly not the only skill needed, IMHO.</p>
<p>I believe the same is true for any Entrepreneur.<br />
They have to see the entire picture, and be a good leader to boot&#8230; it is no wonder leaders are so few compared to the masses&#8230; it is pretty demanding stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/comment-page-1/#comment-63305</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/#comment-63305</guid>
		<description>@Jason,

I accept that, although, I&#039;ll theorize that JOAT isn&#039;t really what makes for your  success.  It seems to me that most successful business owners have a knack for working with people:  finding good employees and business associates; inspiring the team to produce good work, and to do a lot of it; solving problems that come along; finding good deals from outside sources; &quot;selling&quot; yourself,  your ideas, your products/services, etc..  I suppose it helps to be a JOAT to accomplish those things (don&#039;t want to be perceived as naive or a dummy about anything, or be taken advantage of due to your naivete...) but JOAT isn&#039;t what makes it &quot;happen&quot;.  It&#039;s those other &quot;people skills&quot; that are of greatest importance.  A JOAT without that can&#039;t run a business, unless it&#039;s a one-man (or &quot;mom and pop&quot;) operation.

So how about this:  Be a JOAT, but only if you think you can be a successful people-person leader, too.  Otherwise, be a specialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason,</p>
<p>I accept that, although, I&#8217;ll theorize that JOAT isn&#8217;t really what makes for your  success.  It seems to me that most successful business owners have a knack for working with people:  finding good employees and business associates; inspiring the team to produce good work, and to do a lot of it; solving problems that come along; finding good deals from outside sources; &#8220;selling&#8221; yourself,  your ideas, your products/services, etc..  I suppose it helps to be a JOAT to accomplish those things (don&#8217;t want to be perceived as naive or a dummy about anything, or be taken advantage of due to your naivete&#8230;) but JOAT isn&#8217;t what makes it &#8220;happen&#8221;.  It&#8217;s those other &#8220;people skills&#8221; that are of greatest importance.  A JOAT without that can&#8217;t run a business, unless it&#8217;s a one-man (or &#8220;mom and pop&#8221;) operation.</p>
<p>So how about this:  Be a JOAT, but only if you think you can be a successful people-person leader, too.  Otherwise, be a specialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/comment-page-1/#comment-63280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fourhourworkweek.com/blog/2007/09/14/the-top-5-reasons-to-be-a-jack-of-all-trades/#comment-63280</guid>
		<description>@Don:

I propose that while the jobs to be had out there are often for &#039;Extreme specialists&#039; or &#039;Extreme dummies&#039;, it seems likely to me that the &#039;People Doing The HIring&#039; are Jack-Of-All-Trade&#039;s, running their own business and creating their own careers.

I&#039;m one of them ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Don:</p>
<p>I propose that while the jobs to be had out there are often for &#8216;Extreme specialists&#8217; or &#8216;Extreme dummies&#8217;, it seems likely to me that the &#8216;People Doing The HIring&#8217; are Jack-Of-All-Trade&#8217;s, running their own business and creating their own careers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m one of them ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
